INDUSIND BANK LTD. AMOL B. SHINDE vs RAJESH M. PANDEY AND ANR. — EXA/330/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020141732020

Filing Number

EXA/7682/2020

Filing Date

03-Dec-2020

Registration No

EXA/330/2024

Registration Date

06-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LTD. AMOL B. SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH M. PANDEY AND ANR.

  2. 2.MADHU R. PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (Serial Nos. 901-903, 905-1150) involving IndusInd Bank and other parties, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless parties had executed a written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 11-Sep-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 11-Sep-2023

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

  6. 04-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/330/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (Serial Nos. 901-903, 905-1150) involving IndusInd Bank and other parties, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless parties had executed a written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case