KOKAN MERCANTILE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs RAFIQ HUSSAIN SARGUROH AND 3 OTHERS — EXA/1370/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020141392016
Filing Number
EXA/1357/2016
Filing Date
07-Jun-2016
Registration No
EXA/1370/2016
Registration Date
15-Jul-2016
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOKAN MERCANTILE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
Adv. H.S.Bengali
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAFIQ HUSSAIN SARGUROH AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. SUHAIL KHAN, KANCHAN CHAVAN,RES.NO.3 1123 1.
-
2.A) SALEHA RAFIQ SURGUROH1.
-
3.B) ZAIN RAFIQ SURGUROH1.
-
4.C) ZARIN RAFIQ SARGUROH1.
-
5.D) JAVED RAFIQ SARGUROH
-
6.KESWANI DINESH HARISH
-
7.ASLAM HABIB SHELIA
-
8.SWALEHA RAFIQ SARGUROH (SURETY)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters involving Kokan Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which was found void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. All related execution and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
- 13-Jan-2020
- 29-Nov-2019
-
07-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1370/2016
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters involving Kokan Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which was found void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. All related execution and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts