KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED BHUPENDRA MISHRA vs VIKAS VILAS TEKAWADE — EXA/1046/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020140912024
Filing Number
EXA/14085/2024
Filing Date
23-Apr-2024
Registration No
EXA/1046/2025
Registration Date
13-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED BHUPENDRA MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKAS VILAS TEKAWADE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Case Summary (EXA/1046/2025): The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in this case after finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which the court deemed void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The Commercial Execution Applications and connected proceedings were dismissed, and the parties were granted liberty to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
12-Mar-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1046/2025
Case Summary (EXA/1046/2025): The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in this case after finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which the court deemed void ab initio following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The Commercial Execution Applications and connected proceedings were dismissed, and the parties were granted liberty to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts