KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED vs WTECH INDIA SOLUTIONS — EXA/2871/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020140832024

Filing Number

EXA/14077/2024

Filing Date

23-Apr-2024

Registration No

EXA/2871/2024

Registration Date

24-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED

    Adv. BHUPENDRA K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WTECH INDIA SOLUTIONS

  2. 2.HUSNA DHANJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court found all sole arbitrator appointments in these matters were unilateral and therefore set aside the respective arbitral awards and commercial execution applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 23-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2871/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 32-221) following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court found all sole arbitrator appointments in these matters were unilateral and therefore set aside the respective arbitral awards and commercial execution applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case