SANJAY SARRAF vs THE VICE PRESIDENT AND CO MHADA — WP/2022/2025

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020140152025

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/14012/2025

Filing Date

02-05-2025

Registration No

WP/2022/2025

Registration Date

11-06-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT ( 50 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SANJAY SARRAF

Respondent(s)

THE VICE PRESIDENT AND CO MHADA

Ajay Handa

Mahesh Rasai

Mujtab A Rizvi

Jimit Chedar Choudhary

Dropati Godambe

Vinay Sarawgi

Meswani Jignesh

Anmol Parasrampuria

Ramesh Kumar Pareekh

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

18-06-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

17-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

16-03-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

18-02-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

04-02-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 2022 of 2025, the Bombay High Court adjourned the case to June 17, 2026. Respondents' counsel was granted 3 weeks to file an affidavit-in-reply, with any rejoinder to be filed within 1 week thereafter. The matter remains pending before Justices Karnik and Modak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 2022 of 2025, the Bombay High Court adjourned the case to June 17, 2026. Respondents' counsel was granted 3 weeks to file an affidavit-in-reply, with any rejoinder to be filed within 1 week thereafter. The matter remains pending before Justices Karnik and Modak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case