FARAH KAIRUS SIGANPORIA vs SHIROMI DONESH FELFELI Advocate - Rahul Bothra — S/200/2024

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020139782024

Filing Number

S/13973/2024

Filing Date

23-Apr-2024

Registration No

S/200/2024

Registration Date

02-Jul-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

FOR ADMINISTRATION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 1
Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FARAH KAIRUS SIGANPORIA

    Adv. V S Jadhav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIROMI DONESH FELFELI Advocate - Rahul Bothra

  2. 2.FARDOON RUSTOM AFAGH

    Adv. Rahul Bothra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of an administration suit between Shiromi Donesh Felfeli and Farah Kairus Siganporia by accepting a settlement agreement (Consent Terms) signed by both parties on 9th April 2026. The court recorded the agreed terms, dismissed all pending interim applications, and ordered no costs with refund of court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Mar-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 28-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/200/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of an administration suit between Shiromi Donesh Felfeli and Farah Kairus Siganporia by accepting a settlement agreement (Consent Terms) signed by both parties on 9th April 2026. The court recorded the agreed terms, dismissed all pending interim applications, and ordered no costs with refund of court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case