SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD. BHUPENDRA MISHRA vs DADASAHEB SHEIKH — EXA/1038/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020139122024

Filing Number

EXA/13906/2024

Filing Date

22-Apr-2024

Registration No

EXA/1038/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD. BHUPENDRA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DADASAHEB SHEIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 902-1151) because the sole arbitrator's appointment was found to be unilateral, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed the execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 12-Mar-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1038/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 902-1151) because the sole arbitrator's appointment was found to be unilateral, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed the execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case