Teresa Manuel Pereira vs Manuel Pereira alias Manuel Pereira So Thomas Pereira alias Perera Manyual — TP/2381/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020138112026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2026
Filing Number
TP/13811/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
TP/2381/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Teresa Manuel Pereira
Adv. ANAND LAXMIDHAR TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manuel Pereira alias Manuel Pereira So Thomas Pereira alias Perera Manyual
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case TP/2381/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar (Bombay High Court) called the case for directions on 6 May 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per applicable rules, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The case was adjourned pending completion of these procedural requirements, with liberty granted to list the matter for final hearing once all compliance is satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2381/2026
Case TP/2381/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar (Bombay High Court) called the case for directions on 6 May 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per applicable rules, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The case was adjourned pending completion of these procedural requirements, with liberty granted to list the matter for final hearing once all compliance is satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts