KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD vs AMRIT KAUR SOHAL — EXA/1633/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020137672025

Filing Number

EXA/13764/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

EXA/1633/2025

Registration Date

02-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRIT KAUR SOHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in 250+ consolidated cases (including EXA/1633/2025 involving Kotak Mahindra Bank and Amrit Kaur Sohal) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1633/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in 250+ consolidated cases (including EXA/1633/2025 involving Kotak Mahindra Bank and Amrit Kaur Sohal) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case