SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. vs VICKY ARUN YADAV AND 2 ORS. — EXA/282/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020137142022

Filing Number

EXA/13710/2022

Filing Date

26-Apr-2022

Registration No

EXA/282/2023

Registration Date

18-Feb-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Devendra Vitthal Nawadkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VICKY ARUN YADAV AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.VINITA VICKY YADAV

  3. 3.MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International* that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio and ineligibility can be challenged at any stage, including execution. Since all matters involved unilateral sole arbitrator appointments, the court set aside the arbitral awards, dismissed execution applications, and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 26-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/282/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International* that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio and ineligibility can be challenged at any stage, including execution. Since all matters involved unilateral sole arbitrator appointments, the court set aside the arbitral awards, dismissed execution applications, and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case