DEVANG DINESH PARMAR vs THE ESTATE OFFICER, MUMBAI PORT TRUST — WP/2114/2026

Case under Public Premises (Eviction) Act Section 226. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020137022026

Filing Number

WP/13701/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/2114/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Single

Category

EVICTION FROM PUBLIC PREMISES ( 14 )

Sub-Category

UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Public Premises (Eviction) Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVANG DINESH PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ESTATE OFFICER, MUMBAI PORT TRUST

  2. 2.THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MUMBAI

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    Case Summary: The writ petition filed by advocate Devang Dinesh Parmar against the Estate Officer, Mumbai Port Trust and the Board of Trustees was adjourned on 12th June 2026. The petitioner, appearing in-person, sought three weeks' adjournment to obtain independent counsel's advice on the maintainability of the petition. The matter was listed for 1st July 2026, with directions to re-serve copies of the petition on all respondents before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by advocate Devang Dinesh Parmar against the Estate Officer, Mumbai Port Trust and the Board of Trustees was adjourned on 12th June 2026. The petitioner, appearing in-person, sought three weeks' adjournment to obtain independent counsel's advice on the maintainability of the petition. The matter was listed for 1st July 2026, with directions to re-serve copies of the petition on all respondents before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case