RAJAN SHARMA Petitioner vs VENKATRAMA SHARMA Deceased — TP/2324/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020135842026

e-Filing Number

14-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/13583/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2324/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJAN SHARMA Petitioner

    Adv. VINEET A SARAF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VENKATRAMA SHARMA Deceased

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case TP/2324/2026 Summary: The petition has been taken up for direction in a testamentary matter. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citation within two weeks, comply with Rule 396 requirements by submitting/uploading Schedule-I, and issue citation to non-consenting legal heirs if any. The petitioner must ensure compliance with Chapter XXVI of BHC Rules, serve General Citation per Rules 399-400, and furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420 within one week if other legal heirs exist. Case stood over to 19.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2324/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2324/2026 Summary: The petition has been taken up for direction in a testamentary matter. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citation within two weeks, comply with Rule 396 requirements by submitting/uploading Schedule-I, and issue citation to non-consenting legal heirs if any. The petitioner must ensure compliance with Chapter XXVI of BHC Rules, serve General Citation per Rules 399-400, and furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420 within one week if other legal heirs exist. Case stood over to 19.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case