KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD vs AMANDEEP KAUR — EXA/2232/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020135532025

Filing Number

EXA/13550/2025

Filing Date

29-Apr-2025

Registration No

EXA/2232/2025

Registration Date

07-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMANDEEP KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in batch proceedings involving Kotak Mahindra Bank and others, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time spent in the earlier proceedings excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 29-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2232/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in batch proceedings involving Kotak Mahindra Bank and others, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time spent in the earlier proceedings excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case