ANITA RAMESH GUPTA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Advocate - GP OS — WP/2415/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020135192026
Filing Number
WP/13519/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/2415/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANITA RAMESH GUPTA
Adv. Angad Giri
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Advocate - GP OS
-
2.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRA
-
3.THE ASST. REGISTRAR, PAID SCHEME (SPECIAL CELL) AND CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (EASTERN SUBURB), SRA
-
4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, SRA
-
5.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (SPECIAL CELL) SRA
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
Case Summary: WP/2415/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of Anita Ramesh Gupta's writ petition on 12th June 2026. The court directed the SRA (Slum Rehabilitation Authority) respondents to conclude their decision on the petitioner's application dated 19/12/2023 within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner. All contentions were kept open, and the petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2415/2026
Case Summary: WP/2415/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of Anita Ramesh Gupta's writ petition on 12th June 2026. The court directed the SRA (Slum Rehabilitation Authority) respondents to conclude their decision on the petitioner's application dated 19/12/2023 within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner. All contentions were kept open, and the petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts