LAGADAPATI MADHUSUDHAN RAO vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA Advocate - Nitesh Agarwal, SACHIN PATIL,RIYA NARAIN — HCBM20135152025
Case under The Insolvency and Bankrupcy Code,2016 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020135152025
Filing Number
WP/13512/2025
Filing Date
29-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
BANK OTHERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED U/S 986
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAGADAPATI MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Adv. DILIP H SHUKLA
-
2.LAGADAPATI SRIDHAR
-
3.GARLAPATI BHASKARA RAO
-
4.G. VENKATESH BABU
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANK OF MAHARASHTRA Advocate - Nitesh Agarwal, SACHIN PATIL,RIYA NARAIN
-
2.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Adv. Desai Diwanji
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on May 6, 2026, regarding multiple Writ Petitions filed by Lagadapati Madhusudhan Rao, Lagadapati Sridhar, and Garlapati Bhaskara Rao against Bank of Maharashtra and the Reserve Bank of India. The court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections and file compliance within four weeks; failure to do so will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
14-May-2025
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
14-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2025
Case filed
The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on May 6, 2026, regarding multiple Writ Petitions filed by Lagadapati Madhusudhan Rao, Lagadapati Sridhar, and Garlapati Bhaskara Rao against Bank of Maharashtra and the Reserve Bank of India. The court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections and file compliance within four weeks; failure to do so will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts