PANTOMATH CAPITAL ADVISORS PVT LTD Manilal Kher Ambalal and co vs Unknown Person (John Doe) — CHOL/303/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section Section151. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020134412026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CHOL/13441/2026

Filing Date

16-04-2026

Registration No

CHOL/303/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section Section151

Petitioner(s)

PANTOMATH CAPITAL ADVISORS PVT LTD Manilal Kher Ambalal and co

Respondent(s)

Unknown Person (John Doe)

Proton AG

Union of India, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY)

Department of Telecommunications

Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre through Its Nodal Officers Under Ministry of Home Affair

Orders

17-04-2026
REGISTRAR(OS)/PROTHONOTARY and SR. MASTER

Case Summary: CHOL/303/2026 The Bombay High Court granted petitioner Pantomath Capital Advisors Pvt Ltd's chamber order on 17 April 2026, restoring an interim application that was previously rejected on 13 March 2026 for non-compliance with office objections. The court found the rejection was purely technical and that the applicant had complied with suit objections within time. Respondents failed to appear despite service. The applicant must remove office objections and register the interim application within one week, or it stands rejected; any previously granted ad-interim reliefs continue accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CHOL/303/2026 The Bombay High Court granted petitioner Pantomath Capital Advisors Pvt Ltd's chamber order on 17 April 2026, restoring an interim application that was previously rejected on 13 March 2026 for non-compliance with office objections. The court found the rejection was purely technical and that the applicant had complied with suit objections within time. Respondents failed to appear despite service. The applicant must remove office objections and register the interim application within one week, or it stands rejected; any previously granted ad-interim reliefs continue accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case