OMICRON SENSING PVT LTD RKDEWAN LEGAL SERVICES vs MAGNOVA ENGINEERS LLP Advocate - Dandekar, ,Dandekar,Dandekar,Dandekar,Dandekar,Dandekar — COMIP/178/2026
Case under Trade Marks Act Section 134. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020133492026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2026
Filing Number
COMIP/13349/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
COMIP/178/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
TRADE MARKS ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OMICRON SENSING PVT LTD RKDEWAN LEGAL SERVICES
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAGNOVA ENGINEERS LLP Advocate - Dandekar, ,Dandekar,Dandekar,Dandekar,Dandekar,Dandekar
-
2.PAWANKUMAR DHARMRAJ SINGH
Adv. Dandekar
-
3.GAGAN SINGH
Adv. Dandekar
-
4.NILESH JAGDISH JADHAV
Adv. Dandekar
-
5.POONAM NILESH JADHAV
Adv. Dandekar
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
Case Summary: COMIP 178/2026 In this Commercial IP suit, the Bombay High Court (Justice Madhav J. Jamdar) found prima facie evidence that Defendant No.3 and other defendants breached a court order, as documented in the Additional Special Receiver's report. The court directed Defendant No.3 to remain present on 25th June 2026 at 11:00 a.m. The case was adjourned to 25th June 2026 and listed high on the board for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COMIP/178/2026
Case Summary: COMIP 178/2026 In this Commercial IP suit, the Bombay High Court (Justice Madhav J. Jamdar) found prima facie evidence that Defendant No.3 and other defendants breached a court order, as documented in the Additional Special Receiver's report. The court directed Defendant No.3 to remain present on 25th June 2026 at 11:00 a.m. The case was adjourned to 25th June 2026 and listed high on the board for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts