Prem Lata Sudershan Kumar Sachar vs Sudershan Kumar Sachar alias Sudershan Kumar Sikander Lal Sachar — TP/2405/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020133382026

e-Filing Number

15-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/13338/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2405/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prem Lata Sudershan Kumar Sachar

    Adv. Mr. Pravin D. Kadam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudershan Kumar Sachar alias Sudershan Kumar Sikander Lal Sachar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2405/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 7th May 2026 before the Testamentary Registrar. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond for the gross amount per Rule 421, and verify if any cross petition exists. The matter is adjourned pending compliance, with liberty to move for final listing once all requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2405/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2405/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 7th May 2026 before the Testamentary Registrar. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs per Rules 399-400, furnish an Administration Bond for the gross amount per Rule 421, and verify if any cross petition exists. The matter is adjourned pending compliance, with liberty to move for final listing once all requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case