FARAH FIRDAUS BAKSHAY vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — IA/2524/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020133042026

Filing Number

IA/13304/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/2524/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FARAH FIRDAUS BAKSHAY

    Adv. Devashish Godbole

  2. 2.LIA RUSTOM GAGRAT

    Adv. Devashish Godbole

  3. 3.SHERNA IRANI

    Adv. Devashish Godbole

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (BUILDING AND FACTORIES) DEPARTMENT, G/SOUTH WARD

  4. 4.CHARAN PRABHAKAR SHETTY

  5. 5.LATHA PRABHAKAR SHETTY

  6. 6.PRABHKAR L. SHETTY

  7. 7.SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WORLI POLICE STATION

  8. 8.MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, A CONSTITUENT BOARD OF MHADA

  9. 9.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, G/S DIVN MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, MUMBAI

  10. 10.FAROUK MERWAN IRANI (ORIG PETITIONER)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/2524/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to compel MCGM and its Executive Engineer to enforce a stop work notice issued on 31 December 2024. The court found that the statutory authorities had already performed their duty by issuing the notice, and rejected the plea as lacking bona fide, holding that the petitioner was attempting to misuse court processes to harass the opposing parties (respondents 4-6). The court declined to entertain the substitution application filed after the original petitioner's death, emphasizing that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to monitor every action of statutory authorities or serve individual interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2524/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/2524/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to compel MCGM and its Executive Engineer to enforce a stop work notice issued on 31 December 2024. The court found that the statutory authorities had already performed their duty by issuing the notice, and rejected the plea as lacking bona fide, holding that the petitioner was attempting to misuse court processes to harass the opposing parties (respondents 4-6). The court declined to entertain the substitution application filed after the original petitioner's death, emphasizing that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to monitor every action of statutory authorities or serve individual interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case