SMITA UDAYCHAND SOLANKI vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — HCBM20133042025
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020133042025
Filing Number
WP/13301/2025
Filing Date
28-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMITA UDAYCHAND SOLANKI
Adv. C K Tripathi
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
-
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
-
3.SONAL AWHAD JUNIOR ENGINEER (BUILDING DEPARTMENT)
-
4.LATA VIJAY SHAH
-
5.ANKIT VIJAY SHAH
-
6.DEVEN VIJAY SHAH
-
7.VIJAY SHAH
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (L) No. 13301/2025, petitioner Smita Udaychand Solanki's petition against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and related officials was granted a "super last chance" extension. The court extended the deadline to 03.07.2026 for the petitioner to remove office objections and get the petition properly registered/numbered, with a warning that failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
28-Apr-2025
Case filed
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (L) No. 13301/2025, petitioner Smita Udaychand Solanki's petition against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and related officials was granted a "super last chance" extension. The court extended the deadline to 03.07.2026 for the petitioner to remove office objections and get the petition properly registered/numbered, with a warning that failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts