Khan Zainab Furqan Ahmed vs Wahid Ali Khan alias Khan Wahidali Maddan Khan alias Khan Wahid Ali — TP/2450/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020133002026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/13300/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2450/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khan Zainab Furqan Ahmed

    Adv. Hemant Hasnale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Wahid Ali Khan alias Khan Wahidali Maddan Khan alias Khan Wahid Ali

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2450/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Khan Zainab Furqan Ahmed against Wahid Ali Khan was called for directions on 7th May 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The case was adjourned with directions requiring the advocate to: issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The petitioner has liberty to seek relisting after completing all compliance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2450/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Khan Zainab Furqan Ahmed against Wahid Ali Khan was called for directions on 7th May 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The case was adjourned with directions requiring the advocate to: issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The petitioner has liberty to seek relisting after completing all compliance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case