PVR INOX Limited and Anr vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE — WP/2180/2026
Case under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act 1923 Section 4B. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020132852026
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/13285/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
WP/2180/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
POSESSION ON ANY OTHER GROUND ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PVR INOX Limited and Anr
Adv. Agama Law Associates, ,GP OS
Atul Vivekanand Bhandarkar
Adv. Agama Law Associates,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE GP OS
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE
Collector, Entertainment Tax
Adv. GP OS
Deputy Collector, Entertainment Tax
Adv. GP OS
Tabsildar, Office of Collector
Adv. GP OS
Hearing History
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/13285/2026 PVR-INOX Limited challenged entertainment tax demand notices issued by Maharashtra authorities. The Bombay High Court stayed the operation of the impugned demand notices and issued notice returnable on 19th June 2026. The court directed the tax authorities to consider Section 4B of the Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act and a prior court order from August 2025 before raising any demands, emphasizing that procedural fairness requires opportunity of hearing before issuing demand notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/13285/2026 PVR-INOX Limited challenged entertainment tax demand notices issued by Maharashtra authorities. The Bombay High Court stayed the operation of the impugned demand notices and issued notice returnable on 19th June 2026. The court directed the tax authorities to consider Section 4B of the Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act and a prior court order from August 2025 before raising any demands, emphasizing that procedural fairness requires opportunity of hearing before issuing demand notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts