PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PUNE vs J M MHATRE INFRA PVT. LTD. - AY 2015-16 ITA 1668/MUM/2023 Advocate - Mandar Manohar Vaidya — HCBM20132002024

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: HCBM020132002024

e-Filing Number

17-04-2024

Filing Number

ITXA/13195/2024

Filing Date

17-Apr-2024

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PUNE

    Adv. Advocate- ,Ashok N Kotangle

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J M MHATRE INFRA PVT. LTD. - AY 2015-16 ITA 1668/MUM/2023 Advocate - Mandar Manohar Vaidya

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay granted the appellants a final opportunity to remove office objections on multiple Income Tax Appeals and obtain their registration/numbering by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks from the date of decision on interim applications for condonation of delay. If the appellants fail to comply, all Income Tax Appeals will stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 17-Apr-2024

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay granted the appellants a final opportunity to remove office objections on multiple Income Tax Appeals and obtain their registration/numbering by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks from the date of decision on interim applications for condonation of delay. If the appellants fail to comply, all Income Tax Appeals will stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case