Manoj Sunder Gwalani KEYSTONE PARTNERS vs Jewel Villas and Developers LLP — CARBP/509/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section Section9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020131742026
e-Filing Number
10-04-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/13174/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
CARBP/509/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Interim Relief ( 102 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manoj Sunder Gwalani KEYSTONE PARTNERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jewel Villas and Developers LLP
-
2.Ramesh Kotumal Pahlajani
-
3.Rashmi Ramesh Damani
Adv. Vrinda Daga
-
4.Devkishin B Pahlajani
-
5.Jatin N Chokshi
-
6.Ketan N Chokshi
-
7.Ravi R Chokshi
-
8.Kamal Sunder Gwalani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
Case Summary: CARBP 13174/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of a Section 9 petition for interim measures in a partnership dispute arising from a 2013 Deed of Admission of Partners. Since the contesting parties (Respondents 2 and 3) acknowledged the existence of an arbitration agreement during proceedings, the court appointed Ms. Neeta Jain as sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes. The petition was converted into a Section 17 application to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, with costs equally borne by parties and subject to the final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CARBP/509/2026
Case Summary: CARBP 13174/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of a Section 9 petition for interim measures in a partnership dispute arising from a 2013 Deed of Admission of Partners. Since the contesting parties (Respondents 2 and 3) acknowledged the existence of an arbitration agreement during proceedings, the court appointed Ms. Neeta Jain as sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes. The petition was converted into a Section 17 application to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, with costs equally borne by parties and subject to the final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts