Smaarftech Technologies Private Limited JARIWALA ASSOCIATES, ,GP OS vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE — HCBM20131702025
Case under Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act Section 9. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020131702025
e-Filing Number
25-04-2025
Filing Number
WP/13168/2025
Filing Date
25-Apr-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
SALES TAX (STATE) ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smaarftech Technologies Private Limited JARIWALA ASSOCIATES, ,GP OS
-
2.Anand Sarnaik
Adv. JARIWALA ASSOCIATES,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE
-
3.Devyani Anand Sarnaik
Adv. JARIWALA ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE,GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE
-
2.Sales Tax Officer
Adv. GP OS
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The Bombay High Court's order dated May 6, 2026, addresses multiple writ petitions (WPL) listed for rejection. The court gave petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within four weeks. If petitioners fail to comply, all petitions will stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
25-Apr-2025
Case filed
The Bombay High Court's order dated May 6, 2026, addresses multiple writ petitions (WPL) listed for rejection. The court gave petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within four weeks. If petitioners fail to comply, all petitions will stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts