FIRST GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED vs AXIS BANK LIMITED — CARBP/433/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020131452026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

15-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/13145/2026

Filing Date

15-04-2026

Registration No

CARBP/433/2026

Registration Date

22-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

FIRST GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

Adv. Nihar Chitre

Respondent(s)

AXIS BANK LIMITED

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Case Summary: CARBP/433/2026 The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. R.D. Dhanuka (Former Chief Justice) as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between First Global Services Private Limited and Axis Bank Limited. The court converted the Section 9 petition (seeking interim measures pre-arbitration) into a Section 17 application to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, with all substantive issues kept open for the tribunal's determination. Arbitration costs are to be borne equally by both parties, subject to final modification by the tribunal's award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CARBP/433/2026 The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. R.D. Dhanuka (Former Chief Justice) as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between First Global Services Private Limited and Axis Bank Limited. The court converted the Section 9 petition (seeking interim measures pre-arbitration) into a Section 17 application to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, with all substantive issues kept open for the tribunal's determination. Arbitration costs are to be borne equally by both parties, subject to final modification by the tribunal's award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case