RUNWAL DEVELOPERS LIMITED vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM20130882026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020130882026

Filing Number

IA/13088/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUNWAL DEVELOPERS LIMITED

    Adv. Maniar Srivastava Associates,Maniar Srivastava Associates,Maniar Srivastava Associates, ,Maniar Srivastava Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR, THANE

  3. 3.DHRUVA WOOLLEN MILLS PVT. LTD

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY The Bombay High Court dismissed the interim application filed by Runwal Developers Ltd. on jurisdictional grounds. The Court found that the underlying dispute involves issues arising under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which falls outside the subject assignment of the current bench. The petition was removed from the board with liberty granted to the petitioner to file before the appropriate bench with relevant subject matter jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The Bombay High Court dismissed the interim application filed by Runwal Developers Ltd. on jurisdictional grounds. The Court found that the underlying dispute involves issues arising under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which falls outside the subject assignment of the current bench. The petition was removed from the board with liberty granted to the petitioner to file before the appropriate bench with relevant subject matter jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case