AVANSE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs ADARSH SILK MILL — EXA/2308/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020130652023
Filing Number
EXA/13060/2023
Filing Date
08-May-2023
Registration No
EXA/2308/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVANSE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED
Adv. GNP Legal
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADARSH SILK MILL
-
2.KULBHUSHAN ANEJA
-
3.GINNI ANEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters after finding that sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless express written waivers existed under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
18-Sep-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
12-Oct-2023
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
01-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
31-Aug-2023
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
21-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
21-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2308/2025
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters after finding that sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless express written waivers existed under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts