HIRO NIRMALDAS RAMCHANDANI vs LATE DEVIRAM RAMCHANDANI NEE SUNITA — TP/2504/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020130612026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/13061/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2504/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRO NIRMALDAS RAMCHANDANI

    Adv. Ayesha Aejaz Saiyed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LATE DEVIRAM RAMCHANDANI NEE SUNITA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2504/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Hiro Nirmaldas Ramchandani was called for direction on 8th June 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an affidavit of service, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount, and verify if any cross-petitions were filed. The matter was adjourned pending compliance with these procedural requirements, with liberty granted to list the case for final grant once all conditions are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2504/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2504/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Hiro Nirmaldas Ramchandani was called for direction on 8th June 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an affidavit of service, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount, and verify if any cross-petitions were filed. The matter was adjourned pending compliance with these procedural requirements, with liberty granted to list the case for final grant once all conditions are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case