SURYODAY SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs AMBIKA PRASAD PANDE AND ANR — EXA/2508/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020130582022

Filing Number

EXA/13054/2022

Filing Date

21-Apr-2022

Registration No

EXA/2508/2025

Registration Date

28-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURYODAY SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED

    Adv. GNP LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMBIKA PRASAD PANDE AND ANR

  2. 2.VINITA AMBIKAPRASAD PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (involving Suryoday Small Finance Bank and others) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. Consequently, all execution applications and related proceedings were dismissed, though parties may initiate fresh arbitration with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Oct-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2508/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (involving Suryoday Small Finance Bank and others) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. Consequently, all execution applications and related proceedings were dismissed, though parties may initiate fresh arbitration with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case