AVANSE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH PREETI GIRME vs JAINCO POLYSYNTEX PRIVATE LIMITED — EXA/2278/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020130452023
Filing Number
EXA/13040/2023
Filing Date
08-May-2023
Registration No
EXA/2278/2025
Registration Date
13-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVANSE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH PREETI GIRME
Adv. GNP Legal
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAINCO POLYSYNTEX PRIVATE LIMITED
-
2.SONAM VIKAS JAGAWAT
-
3.VIKAS NARESH JAGAWANT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 902-1148) following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period from original invocation excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
18-Sep-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
20-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
20-Oct-2023
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
01-Sep-2023
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
31-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
21-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
21-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2278/2025
The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 902-1148) following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period from original invocation excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts