INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYL BOMBAY J SAGAR AND ASSOCIATES vs PRAVINKUMAR RAMACHANDRA GHODAKE — HCBM20130442026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020130442026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-04-2026
Filing Number
IA/13044/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYL BOMBAY J SAGAR AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
PRAVINKUMAR RAMACHANDRA GHODAKE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR FURTHER AD-INTERIM RELIEF
FOR FURTHER AD-INTERIM RELIEF
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR FURTHER AD-INTERIM RELIEF |
| 17-06-2026 | FOR FURTHER AD-INTERIM RELIEF |
Orders
Case Summary The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to IIT Bombay against Pravinkumar Ramachandra Ghodake for wilful violation of prior court orders. The respondent repeatedly breached restraint orders by circulating defamatory emails to media houses, using multiple email addresses and making allegations of criminal investigation and fraud against the institution. The court appointed a Court Receiver to identify, inventory, and preserve all devices, email accounts, and digital repositories used for the impugned communications, with liberty to take custody if non-cooperation occurs. The matter was adjourned to 17th June 2026, with a warning that a warrant would be issued if the respondent fails to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to IIT Bombay against Pravinkumar Ramachandra Ghodake for wilful violation of prior court orders. The respondent repeatedly breached restraint orders by circulating defamatory emails to media houses, using multiple email addresses and making allegations of criminal investigation and fraud against the institution. The court appointed a Court Receiver to identify, inventory, and preserve all devices, email accounts, and digital repositories used for the impugned communications, with liberty to take custody if non-cooperation occurs. The matter was adjourned to 17th June 2026, with a warning that a warrant would be issued if the respondent fails to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts