GUNDLUPET FINANCES AND INVESTMENT PVT LTD (ASSIGNEE OF DEBTS OF MUNDHRA FISCAL SERVICES PVT. LTD) vs ASHOK MANUBHAI BHAGAT — CHOL/319/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020130182026
Filing Number
CHOL/13018/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
CHOL/319/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )
Sub-Category
Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GUNDLUPET FINANCES AND INVESTMENT PVT LTD (ASSIGNEE OF DEBTS OF MUNDHRA FISCAL SERVICES PVT. LTD)
Adv. Goenka Law Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOK MANUBHAI BHAGAT
-
2.VIRENDRA GUPTA
-
3.VIPUL TOSANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
The court granted Gundlupet Finances' Chamber Order to restore its previously rejected application under O.S. Rule 986, finding the reasons for non-compliance of office objections to be bonafide and holding that substantial justice cannot be denied on technical grounds. The applicant must remove office objections and register the application within one week from the order date, or face automatic rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
For Hearing And Final Disposal
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CHOL/319/2026
The court granted Gundlupet Finances' Chamber Order to restore its previously rejected application under O.S. Rule 986, finding the reasons for non-compliance of office objections to be bonafide and holding that substantial justice cannot be denied on technical grounds. The applicant must remove office objections and register the application within one week from the order date, or face automatic rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts