TATA CAPITAL LIMITED I V MERCHANT AND CoMPANY vs ARDOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED — CARBP/438/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section SECTION29A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020129902026
e-Filing Number
10-04-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/12990/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
CARBP/438/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Extension of Arbitral Mandate ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED I V MERCHANT AND CoMPANY
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARDOR INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
-
2.BHARAT SHAH
-
3.GITA BEN SHAH
-
4.FENIL SHAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The Bombay High Court granted Tata Capital Limited's petition to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate by one year until April 30, 2027, finding the extension request reasonable and routine under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court directed expeditious proceedings and mandated the parties to cooperate without insisting on evening or weekend hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CARBP/438/2026
The Bombay High Court granted Tata Capital Limited's petition to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate by one year until April 30, 2027, finding the extension request reasonable and routine under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court directed expeditious proceedings and mandated the parties to cooperate without insisting on evening or weekend hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts