Meenakshi Jatin W o Jatinkumar Ashok Mhatre PRABHU VELAR vs Saraswathi Mani W o P Subramanyam — TP/2867/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020128652026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/12865/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2867/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Meenakshi Jatin W o Jatinkumar Ashok Mhatre PRABHU VELAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saraswathi Mani W o P Subramanyam

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2867/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Meenakshi Jatin was called for directions on 15th June 2026. The court directed the advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff of Mumbai, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The matter was adjourned to be relisted after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2867/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2867/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Meenakshi Jatin was called for directions on 15th June 2026. The court directed the advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff of Mumbai, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The matter was adjourned to be relisted after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case