SAMEER HAKIM PATHAN vs THE GENERAL MANAGER — CARBP/383/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section SECTION9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020128612026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/12861/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARBP/383/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section SECTION9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMEER HAKIM PATHAN

    Adv. C K Tripathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GENERAL MANAGER

  2. 2.THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to the petitioner, directing Western Railways to decide his representation for adjusting license fees paid during the non-operational period (January-April 2025) within 4 weeks, and restraining contract termination until 2 weeks after the decision is communicated. The court found merit in the petitioner's claim since the restaurant could not operate before May 7, 2025 due to railway's failure to provide infrastructure, despite possession being handed over in November 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/383/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to the petitioner, directing Western Railways to decide his representation for adjusting license fees paid during the non-operational period (January-April 2025) within 4 weeks, and restraining contract termination until 2 weeks after the decision is communicated. The court found merit in the petitioner's claim since the restaurant could not operate before May 7, 2025 due to railway's failure to provide infrastructure, despite possession being handed over in November 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case