MOMIN PARVEZ MOHAMMAD ILYAS (3RD PARTY APPLICANT SON OF PLAINTIFF) vs KHAWAJA KARAMALI MOMIN AND ORS — HCBM20128022026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020128022026

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

TPAC/12802/2026

Filing Date

09-04-2026

Judge

Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Coram

Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

MOMIN PARVEZ MOHAMMAD ILYAS (3RD PARTY APPLICANT SON OF PLAINTIFF)

Respondent(s)

KHAWAJA KARAMALI MOMIN AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

17-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

20-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

20-04-2026
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Case Summary: The Third Party Application filed by Momin Parvez Mohammad Ilyas (son of Plaintiff No. 2) seeking certified copies of Exhibits 1, 19, 20 and related orders from Suit No. 406 of 1951 was allowed. The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause as the documents are needed for Writ Petition No. 6401 of 2025. The court directed the office to issue certified copies upon payment of necessary charges, subject to record availability, with the restriction that copies be used only for stated purposes and not shared with third parties per Bombay High Court Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Third Party Application filed by Momin Parvez Mohammad Ilyas (son of Plaintiff No. 2) seeking certified copies of Exhibits 1, 19, 20 and related orders from Suit No. 406 of 1951 was allowed. The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause as the documents are needed for Writ Petition No. 6401 of 2025. The court directed the office to issue certified copies upon payment of necessary charges, subject to record availability, with the restriction that copies be used only for stated purposes and not shared with third parties per Bombay High Court Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case