DINESH BABULAL SANGHAVI vs UNION OF INDIA — CONPW/32/2025

Case under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020127742025

Filing Number

CONPW/12774/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

CONPW/32/2025

Registration Date

03-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH BABULAL SANGHAVI

    Adv. Markand Gandhi

  2. 2.VINOD JAYANTILAL RATHOD

  3. 3.MAHENDRA DALICHAND JAIN

  4. 4.CHANDAN JAYANTILAL VORA

  5. 5.MILIND JAYANTILAL VORA

  6. 6.AMIT VINOD GANDHI

  7. 7.JAYESH SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, ALSO THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT BOMBAY

  3. 3.MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

  4. 4.WESTERN RAILWAYS

  5. 5.DIVISIONAL RAIL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY

  6. 6.DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, ESTATE/SOUTH, WESTERN RAILWAY, MUMBAI CENTRAL

  7. 7.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  8. 8.OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (DP) CITY

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    -Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

    Case Summary: CONPW/32/2025 The Bombay High Court found that officers Mr. Pankaj Singh, Mr. Abhishek Mittal, and Mr. Sunil Rathod committed contempt of court by failing to comply with a March 19, 2024 judgment (which the Supreme Court declined to interfere with in August 2024). The Court issued contempt notices to these three individuals returnable on June 24, 2026, and directed their advocates to provide names of responsible persons/predecessors within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    -Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Urgent Order

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Urgent Order

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Urgent Order

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  15. 22-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  16. 22-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  18. 15-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONPW/32/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CONPW/32/2025 The Bombay High Court found that officers Mr. Pankaj Singh, Mr. Abhishek Mittal, and Mr. Sunil Rathod committed contempt of court by failing to comply with a March 19, 2024 judgment (which the Supreme Court declined to interfere with in August 2024). The Court issued contempt notices to these three individuals returnable on June 24, 2026, and directed their advocates to provide names of responsible persons/predecessors within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case