KISHOR TUKARAM HALDANKAR SANTOSH VISHWANATH TAWDE vs DY.COLLECTOR (SPECIAL CELL) SRA EASTERN SUBURBAN — WP/2058/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020126902026
Filing Number
WP/12690/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
WP/2058/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KISHOR TUKARAM HALDANKAR SANTOSH VISHWANATH TAWDE
UTTAM JANARDAN NANOSKAR
NILESH DATTARAM MORE
MANISHA MANOHAR MORE
SANDIP SITARAM PARKAR
ASHOK KHANDU PANCHAL
MANDA MOHAN KADAM
RAJASHRI KISHORE JADAHV
Respondent(s)
DY.COLLECTOR (SPECIAL CELL) SRA EASTERN SUBURBAN
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR HOUSING SOCIETIES(SRA) EASTERN AND WESTERN SUBURBAN
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(SRA)
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(SRA)
THE APEX GRIEVANCE AND REDRESSAL COMMITTEE
SHOOR SAMBHAJI SRA CHS LTD
GAFOOR KHAN SRA CHS LTD
M/S RIZVI ESTATE AND HOTELS PVT LTD
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to expeditiously decide Application No. 129 of 2022 within 12 weeks from the date of order communication. The court found the petitioners' request reasonable and kept all contentions open for consideration before the AGRC, requiring both parties to cooperate without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to expeditiously decide Application No. 129 of 2022 within 12 weeks from the date of order communication. The court found the petitioners' request reasonable and kept all contentions open for consideration before the AGRC, requiring both parties to cooperate without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts