KAMLA HOMES AND LIFESTYLES PRIVATE LIMITED vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — CHOL/354/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020126592026

Filing Number

CHOL/12659/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CHOL/354/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLA HOMES AND LIFESTYLES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. AVP Partners

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  2. 2.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR MUMBAI

  3. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEEER (BP)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    The court allowed Kamla Homes and Lifestyles Private Limited's chamber order to set aside the March 7, 2026 rejection of their petition for non-compliance with office objections. The court condoned the 13-day delay, finding the applicant's reasons (document translation issues, unavailability due to travel) justified restoration of the petition. However, the court imposed Rs. 2,500 cost on the petitioner and granted four weeks to cure the office objections, failing which the petition stands rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Hearing And Final Disposal

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHOL/354/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Kamla Homes and Lifestyles Private Limited's chamber order to set aside the March 7, 2026 rejection of their petition for non-compliance with office objections. The court condoned the 13-day delay, finding the applicant's reasons (document translation issues, unavailability due to travel) justified restoration of the petition. However, the court imposed Rs. 2,500 cost on the petitioner and granted four weeks to cure the office objections, failing which the petition stands rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case