KANCHAN KIRAN GARDE vs KRISHNATH BALAKU SASE ALIAS KISAN BALAKU SASE ALIAS KRUSHNAT BALAKU SASE — TP/2573/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020125882026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
08-04-2026
Filing Number
TP/12588/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
TP/2573/2026
Registration Date
08-05-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANCHAN KIRAN GARDE
Adv. KUNAL SUNIL JADHAV
KIRAN SURYAKANT GARDE
Adv. JADHAV KUNAL SUNIL
Respondent(s)
KRISHNATH BALAKU SASE ALIAS KISAN BALAKU SASE ALIAS KRUSHNAT BALAKU SASE
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case TP/2573/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Kanchan Kiran Garde and Kiran Suryakant Garde was called for directions on 9th June 2026. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and instructed the petitioner's advocate to serve non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office and file an affidavit of service. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned pending compliance, with liberty for the advocate to seek listing for final hearing once all procedural requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case TP/2573/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Kanchan Kiran Garde and Kiran Suryakant Garde was called for directions on 9th June 2026. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and instructed the petitioner's advocate to serve non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office and file an affidavit of service. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned pending compliance, with liberty for the advocate to seek listing for final hearing once all procedural requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts