ANITA VIJAY SOLANKI vs TEJU VALJI WAGH ALIAS TEJUBEN VALJI WAGH AND ANR — HCBM20125872026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 1. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020125872026
Filing Number
TPAC/12587/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Coram
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANITA VIJAY SOLANKI
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.TEJU VALJI WAGH ALIAS TEJUBEN VALJI WAGH AND ANR
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
Summary: The Third Party Application (TPACL/12587/2026) was allowed and disposed of. The court directed the office to issue a certified copy of the record and proceedings of Testamentary Petition No. 1460 of 2020 to the third party applicant (Anita Vijay Solanki) upon payment of necessary charges, finding sufficient cause for the issuance. The certified copy is to be used only for the stated purpose in accordance with Bombay High Court O.S. Rules 271 and not shared with any other third party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
-
15-Apr-2026
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Summary: The Third Party Application (TPACL/12587/2026) was allowed and disposed of. The court directed the office to issue a certified copy of the record and proceedings of Testamentary Petition No. 1460 of 2020 to the third party applicant (Anita Vijay Solanki) upon payment of necessary charges, finding sufficient cause for the issuance. The certified copy is to be used only for the stated purpose in accordance with Bombay High Court O.S. Rules 271 and not shared with any other third party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts