Atul Ramakant Patil p vas and company vs Ramakant Pandurang Patil — TP/2373/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020125652026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/12565/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2373/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Atul Ramakant Patil p vas and company

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramakant Pandurang Patil

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2373/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 6th May 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, and instructed the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final hearing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2373/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2373/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 6th May 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector, and instructed the petitioner's advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final hearing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case