Smita Shyam Ekhe vs Shyam Baliram Ekhe, — TP/2521/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020125352026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

TP/12535/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

TP/2521/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smita Shyam Ekhe

    Adv. Chitra Nilesh Patkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shyam Baliram Ekhe,

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case TP/2521/2026 Summary: The petition filed by Smita Shyam Ekhe was admitted for direction in this testamentary matter. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks, comply with Rule 396 requirements by submitting Schedule-I copies, and serve notice on non-consenting legal heirs per BHC Rules. The petitioner must fulfill Chapter XXVI requisitions including explanation of delay and locker inventory, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420, and the office shall verify any cross-petitions. The case is adjourned to 02.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2521/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2521/2026 Summary: The petition filed by Smita Shyam Ekhe was admitted for direction in this testamentary matter. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks, comply with Rule 396 requirements by submitting Schedule-I copies, and serve notice on non-consenting legal heirs per BHC Rules. The petitioner must fulfill Chapter XXVI requisitions including explanation of delay and locker inventory, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420, and the office shall verify any cross-petitions. The case is adjourned to 02.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case