SHAKTI PROPERTY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY APARNNA DEVKAR vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) SRA — HCBM20125192025

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM020125192025

Filing Number

WP/12518/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

Slum areas ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAKTI PROPERTY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY APARNNA DEVKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) SRA

  2. 2.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES

  3. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WEST SUBURB SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ORIGINAL SIDE

  5. 5.VARONIC D COSTA

  6. 6.BAIJNATH NAMMA JAISWAL

  7. 7.RAMASAGAR PRATAP BHARDWAJ

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The case named in the heading (SHAKTI PROPERTY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY and APARNNA DEVKAR v. CEO SRA and others) does not appear in the substantive court order provided. The document is a rejection order listing 62 writ petitions (WPL cases from 2025) before the Bombay High Court. The court gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to cure office objections by filing compliance praecipes, or their petitions would be rejected for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The case named in the heading (SHAKTI PROPERTY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY and APARNNA DEVKAR v. CEO SRA and others) does not appear in the substantive court order provided. The document is a rejection order listing 62 writ petitions (WPL cases from 2025) before the Bombay High Court. The court gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to cure office objections by filing compliance praecipes, or their petitions would be rejected for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case