ASHWIN V. SHETTY INDIA LAW ALLIANCE vs THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MCGM TH. ASSTT. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER — HCBM20124832026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020124832026

Filing Number

WP/12483/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWIN V. SHETTY INDIA LAW ALLIANCE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MCGM TH. ASSTT. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  2. 2.BELMONTE TOWER CONDOMINIUM TH. CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

    Adv. Yash A Dhakad

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    This is a common order from the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026 addressing multiple matters that could not be heard due to paucity of time. The court directed removal of office objections within two weeks, required affidavits in reply to be filed one week before the next date, and ordered petitioners to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 14 days or face dismissal against unserved respondents. The matters were adjourned and listed for fresh admission, urgent admission, urgent orders, and due admission on various dates between 24 June and 6 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This is a common order from the Bombay High Court dated 9 June 2026 addressing multiple matters that could not be heard due to paucity of time. The court directed removal of office objections within two weeks, required affidavits in reply to be filed one week before the next date, and ordered petitioners to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 14 days or face dismissal against unserved respondents. The matters were adjourned and listed for fresh admission, urgent admission, urgent orders, and due admission on various dates between 24 June and 6 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case