GANGAMMA NAGENDRA VANNAL vs NAGENDRA KARVESAPPA VANNAL (DECASED) — TP/941/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020124022024
e-Filing Number
08-04-2024
Filing Number
TP/12396/2024
Filing Date
10-Apr-2024
Registration No
TP/941/2025
Registration Date
17-Feb-2025
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANGAMMA NAGENDRA VANNAL
Adv. Darshana Sapkal
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAGENDRA KARVESAPPA VANNAL (DECASED)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: TP/941/2025 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The probate petition filed by Gangamma Nagendra Vannal for the will of her deceased husband Nagendra Karvesappa Vannal (died 01.01.2021) was allowed. All legal heirs consented to her appointment as sole executrix, all required documents and affidavits were submitted, and procedural delays were condoned. The court directed the office to issue probate after verifying no cross-petitions or caveats were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
07-May-2025
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
12-Mar-2025
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. TP/941/2025
Case Summary: TP/941/2025 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The probate petition filed by Gangamma Nagendra Vannal for the will of her deceased husband Nagendra Karvesappa Vannal (died 01.01.2021) was allowed. All legal heirs consented to her appointment as sole executrix, all required documents and affidavits were submitted, and procedural delays were condoned. The court directed the office to issue probate after verifying no cross-petitions or caveats were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts