SURYODAY SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs PRADEEP GUNDAPPA KASHETTY AND ANR — EXA/2428/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020123922022
Filing Number
EXA/12389/2022
Filing Date
13-Apr-2022
Registration No
EXA/2428/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURYODAY SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Adv. GNP LEGAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRADEEP GUNDAPPA KASHETTY AND ANR
-
2.JAGDEVI PRADEEP KASHETTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases involving Suryoday Small Finance Bank and others, finding the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The Court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless express written waiver agreements exist under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
16-Oct-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
05-Jan-2023
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla
-
13-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. ColabawallaView PDF
-
06-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2428/2025
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases involving Suryoday Small Finance Bank and others, finding the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The Court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless express written waiver agreements exist under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts