STS KPTL JV vs KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - I V Merchant — CARAP/262/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020123832026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CARAP/12383/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARAP/262/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STS KPTL JV

    Adv. J Sagar Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - I V Merchant

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: STS KPTL JV v. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited The Bombay High Court granted liberty to both parties to request the Arbitral Tribunal to conduct arbitration using arbitrator fees as per Schedule-IV of the Bombay High Court (Fees Payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018, recognizing that the respondent is a Public Sector Undertaking. This order addressed the fee structure applicable to the ongoing arbitration proceedings between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARAP/262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STS KPTL JV v. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited The Bombay High Court granted liberty to both parties to request the Arbitral Tribunal to conduct arbitration using arbitrator fees as per Schedule-IV of the Bombay High Court (Fees Payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018, recognizing that the respondent is a Public Sector Undertaking. This order addressed the fee structure applicable to the ongoing arbitration proceedings between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case