ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd vs Excel Engineers and Consultants Advocate - RUSHIKESH K GAIKWAD — CARAP/279/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020123382026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CARAP/12338/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CARAP/279/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd

    Adv. Abhishek Salian

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Excel Engineers and Consultants Advocate - RUSHIKESH K GAIKWAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay appointed Justice Shrikant Kulkarni (retired judge) as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd. and Excel Engineers & Consultants arising from purchase orders, with the seat of arbitration at Pune. Both parties consented to the appointment and agreed to share arbitral costs equally, with all substantive issues reserved for the tribunal's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARAP/279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay appointed Justice Shrikant Kulkarni (retired judge) as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd. and Excel Engineers & Consultants arising from purchase orders, with the seat of arbitration at Pune. Both parties consented to the appointment and agreed to share arbitral costs equally, with all substantive issues reserved for the tribunal's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case